Nikon Z 800mm f6.3 VR S review; Nikon Z 400mm f2.8 TC VR S review; Nikon Z 28-75mm f2.8 review; Nikon Z 24-120mm f4 S review; Nikon Z 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 review; Nikon Z 40mm f2 review; Nikon Z 28mm f2.8 review; Nikon Z MC 50mm f2.8 review; Nikon Z MC 105mm f2.8 VR S review; Laowa 25mm f2.8 2.5-5x Ultra Macro review; Laowa 15mm f4.5 Zero-D Shift In this comparison we’ve tested the Sony against the equivalent Canon and Nikon rival models. We’ve chosen the higher resolution 50-Mpix Canon EOS 5DS R to highlight the potential of the Canon combination, but even when tested on the lower 22-Mpix resolution Canon EOS 5D Mark III, the EF 24-70mm F2.8L II still achieves peak sharpness levels similar to the Sony.

Considerably more compact and lightweight than the latest Nikon AF-S 24-70mm lens and at only half the purchase price, it’s a good choice if you don’t need the faster f/2.8 aperture. Read our full Nikon AF-S 24-120mm f/4G ED VR review for more details

See It Read Our Nikon Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Review. 4.0 . Excellent . Nikon Nikkor Z 70-200mm F2.8 VR S. $2,696.95 at Amazon See It Read Our Nikon Nikkor Z 70-200mm F2.8 VR S Review. See my Nikon 24-70mm f2.8E VR review. Sony offers different versions of a 24-70mm f2.8 zoom but their latest is the FE 24-70mm f2.8 GM. The lens does not offers its own image stabilization so you need to rely on the built-in stabilization featured in recent Sony bodies. It is sold for around 2060 EUR. See our Sony FE 24-70mm f2.8 GM review-in
These are really impressive MTF curves with excellent resolution, but it’s always helpful to compare things a bit, so below are side-by-side comparisons with the Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 Mk II and Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 AF-S VR lenses. First, we’ll compare the MTFs at 24mm.
Following is a comparison with the Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 OS Art, the Nikon 24-70mm f2.8E VR and the Tamron SP 24-70mm f2.8 VC (1st generation). The Sigma was shot on a D810 with an older, less contrasty print of the test-target and a little less sharpening of 35/0.5/36/10: Above: Tamron 24-70mm f2.8 VC G2 on D850 at 24mm, f2.8

Nikon engineers did a remarkable job by optically redesigning the lens and adding all the bells and whistles we have come to expect from the latest and greatest. Although some compromises had to be made, Nikon still managed to bring us the best 24-70mm on the market. NIKON D810 + 24-70mm f/2.8 @ 38mm, ISO 64, 2/1, f/8.0

Sigma does a good job of taking indoor photos. But Nikon produces the natural color more. Nikon is noticeably longer than Sigma when it pulls the 70mm. When it comes to shooting the moving objects both lenses struggle a bit. They keep losing focus. But overall Nikon 24-70mm does a better job than the Sigma 24-70mm.
Find out what 14 readers thought of the Nikon 28-70mm f/2.8 ED-IF AF-S Nikkor in our review. over the new 24-70 2.8 G lens that Nikon has now. companion for the 70-200 f/2.8 VR. In essence
It has a fast maximum aperture of f/2.8, making it great for low light photography. It also has Canon’s latest optical technology for sharpness and reduced distortion. Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR Lens: This Nikon lens is a great option for those who want excellent image quality with fast autofocus.
The Nikon Z 24-200mm F4-6.3 VR Nikkor might not be the most exciting zoom lens in the growing Z lens lineup, but it is undoubtedly one of the most important. it's nice to have 24-70mm F2.8 and
The clear winner here is the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G, which shows excellent center, mid-frame and corner sharpness, especially when stopped down. The Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 suffers quite a bit in the corners due to field curvature. Here, we can see that the Tamron suffers greatly at anything beyond 50mm, showing very poor overall performance. zOnjm.
  • r39nc5h774.pages.dev/311
  • r39nc5h774.pages.dev/286
  • r39nc5h774.pages.dev/212
  • r39nc5h774.pages.dev/206
  • r39nc5h774.pages.dev/305
  • r39nc5h774.pages.dev/291
  • r39nc5h774.pages.dev/362
  • r39nc5h774.pages.dev/166

    • nikon 24 70mm f2 8 vr review